April 28 – Chicago Were In Transit To Stardom

A big band, in every sense of the phrase, had its “Beginnings” on this day in 1969. Chicago‘s debut album, which was using the band’s original name “Chicago Transit Authority” hit the shelves 55 years ago.

Chicago (or CTA) had formed two years prior in the Windy City and much like Blood, Sweat and Tears, incorporated a liberal use of horns in their jazz-rock music. They signed to Columbia Records, home to BS&T, thanks largely to their producer James Guercio, who had also done the work with the other band. He lobbied hard for Chicago, and eventually Clive Davis agreed saying later it was an obvious fit for the label who enjoyed the “blending elements of jazz, pop and rock (which was) ground-breaking.” Others suggest he hesitated, thinking them too similar to his other horn band. Either way, they went with Columbia and had a rocky relationship with Davis who liked their music but not their demands for things like double-albums and posters included inside the LP.

Chicago Transit Authority (later nicknamed “Chicago I”) was audacious as a debut. It was indeed a double-LP, with nearly 78 minutes of music over 12 songs, only two of which were under 4” in length. The final track, “Liberation” ran over 14 minutes. While the band boasted several singers, several writers and an unusual (for rock) trio of horn players – Walter Parazaider, James Pankow (who also handled the cowbell) and Lee Loughlane – at this point in time, Robert Lamm, the keyboardist, was clearly in charge. He wrote most of the tracks and sang lead on over half of the songs including the appropriate for a debut “Beginnings.” Peter Cetera, later to take a more prominent role, shared vocal duties on “Questions 67 & 68” and did a bit of the writing.

Remarkably the seven-man outfit recorded the entire body of work in five days in New York City, with the final mixing taking another five. The six-minute plus “Free Form Guitar”, guitarist Terry Kath’s homage to his friend Jimi Hendrix, was recorded all in one take. The album however, sounded anything but raw or unplanned.

While it contains a trio of songs now considered not only among the band’s best but among Oldies Radio’s mainstays, it wasn’t an overnight success. The first single, “Questions 67 & 68” barely charted at first, and “Beginnings” didn’t at all. And the album languished in the low parts of the Billboard charts. However, their fanbase grew and the release of their second album made them popular, at which point this record rose up the charts, eventually to #17 in the U.S. and #10 in Canada. It stayed on the charts for 171 weeks, setting a record for longevity in 1974 (although at the time there was another album on there which would eclipse that soon – Dark side of The Moon.) After being sued by the commuter transportation company and having to lose the “transit authority” off their name, and having success with Chicago II, Columbia wisely re-released singles off the debut in 1971… to much better reception. “Beginnings” would rise to #7 and “Does Anybody Really Know What Time It Is?” did as well, and hit #2 in Canada in 1971. The album eventually earned them a double-platinum award and a nomination for the Best New Group at the Grammys. They lost that one to Crosby, Stills & Nash… as did Led Zeppelin.

Allmusic rate the record as a 4-star effort, saying “few debut albums can boast as consistently solid an effort.” Classic Rock Reviews agrees, saying that they “fused brass, jazz, soul and blues-based rock & roll, and with three lead vocalists and composers, the group’s sound was as diverse as their influences” and thinking that on some of the songs, especially “Does Anybody…”, the entire group brought along their “A-game.”

Apparently we agreed, as the record began a streak of 12-straight albums from them which hit the American top 20.

18 thoughts on “April 28 – Chicago Were In Transit To Stardom

  1. Badfinger (Max)

    It was a great debut album. I have to wonder when they first started…they couldn’t have made a great deal of money because of such a huge band…that is a lot of members to pay.
    They were so different besides Blood, Sweat, and Tears formed by Al Kooper. I like so many of their early songs.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Some real good ones on this record, looking back now it seems remarkable it wasn’t big right away. Fair point about their pay, would’ve had to sell a good number of records to get good pay for the whole cast.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Badfinger (Max)

        Yea it would….we kept our band at 4 members for a little of that reason lol.
        Yea this should have been big off the bat… but something new like this takes time I guess.

        Liked by 2 people

      2. The double album debut twice-the-price outlay would have put off a few youngsters; having to stump up your hard earned (or wheedled) pocket money on a new band with a new sound might not be the best choice?

        Liked by 1 person

      3. audacious to say the least. Probably a lot to be said for the artists who went the common ’80s way and put out an EP or mini-album to get known then worked up to an album. In terms of what you’re talking about, it would be a lot easier to get people to take it to the checkout.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. When I saw them at Texas International Pop Festival, no one knew who they were. This big band with horns hit the stage and then everybody knew who they were, and still do. They were the high point of the festival, even more so than Janis and Zeppelin. I bought the album a few days later, and still have it.

    Liked by 1 person

      1. I liked their ‘soft rock’ hits of the ’70s by and large, quite a bit – ‘Old Days’, ‘Wishin You Were Here’ etc, but not much of their all-Cetera ’80s work grabbed me.

        Liked by 1 person

    1. that is true. Something we don’t think about often, same for big acts on the road. I saw a documentary on the effects of Covid on musicians – was actually more boring than I thought it would be – but they interviewed one of the guys from Foreigner and he said, you know, like most people, when it first broke, he was thinking like ‘damn, we’re gonna have to cancel like 8 shows in the next two weeks’ but obviously it kept on and in summer they were supposed to tour Canada, and he said ‘well we KNEW we weren’t going to be able to get across there’ and eventually it got to looking like a whole lost year. He was saying personally, he kind of liked it because he was happy to stay home, be with his wife, write a few tunes but the band really worried about their crew. He said they had 10 full time employees as road crew – drivers, roadies etc, andthey couldn’t afford to be out of work for a year. (They set up an auction of band instruments and memorabilia to give some cash to the crew). You don’t normally think about that aspect.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. surely. Same show also talked to a theatre manager in – was it JAcksonville? – same sort of thing. From about 20 shows of one type or another a month to zero for months. The business struggled and all the ticket takers, cleaners, snack bar people were out of jobs.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. that it was. That and 9/11,the two real landmark events of my lifetime I think although obviously one was brief but had huge lasting impact, the other was an event because it went on so long yet, by now it seems didn’t do that much to change our day to day lives which surprises me. By the time summer 2020 rolled around, I figured wearing masks in stores would be the new norm, movie theatres would never return and so on.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment